ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2026
Sensitivity to negative-feedback processing in people with Parkinson's disease and impulsive-compulsive behaviours.
Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomarkers of impulsive compulsive behaviours (ICBs) in Parkinson’s disease (PD) are lacking. We combined behavioural and electrophysiological markers of sensitivity to negative feedback to address this lack of knowledge. Eighteen PD patients (ICB+, N = 8; ICB-, N = 10) underwent electroencephalography during the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART), a measure of risky behaviour, and the feedback-related negativity (FRN), a measure of negative feedback processing, was recorded. Participants also completed the Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (QUIP-rs), and underwent cognitive, affective and motivation measures. Behaviour on the BART and FRN measures did not differ between the ICB + and ICB- groups. However, a significant positive correlation was observed between the amplitude of the FRN at the Cz electrode and the BART discrepancy score when the two groups were combined into one PD group (rs(18) = 0.52, p = 0.03; 95% CI = 0.07, 0.80). No additional correlations were found between FRN amplitudes and the QUIP-rs score, nor with cognitive, affective, or motivational measures. Our findings indicate that, regardless of ICB status, PD patients may be able to process negative feedback to mitigate risky behaviour during reward-related decision-making. We observed that a higher feedback-related negativity (FRN) is linked to a decrease in risky behaviour following a balloon burst. However, due to the small sample size, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Future studies should explore both positive and negative feedback processing using a task that maintains the dynamics of the ongoing decision-making process while increasing risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40560248What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.