ArticleInternational ophthalmology2025
Accuracy of 12 IOL power calculation formulas in highly myopic eyes.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Accuracy of Kane, Hill-RBF, and PEARL-DGS versus traditional IOL formulas in highly myopic eyes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluation of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas for Highly Myopic Eyes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Refractive outcomes after cataract surgery using swept-source OCT biometry and image-guided toric IOL alignment: a prospective comparative study in normal versus long axial length eyes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An explainable machine learning framework for accurate prediction of postoperative anterior chamber depth in highly myopic cataract surgery.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Response to Comment on: Accuracy of 12 IOL power calculation formulas in highly myopic eyes.International ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence driven intraocular lens power calculation in extreme axial myopia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comment on: accuracy of 12 IOL power calculation formulas in highly myopic eyes.International ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of traditional and AI-based intraocular lens power calculation formulas in highly myopic eyes.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess and compare the accuracy of 12 intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas after cataract phacoemulsification surgery in eyes with an axial length (AL) greater than or equal to 26.00 mm (≥ 26.00 mm).
methodsA retrospective case series study including 72 eyes with an AL ≥ 26.00 mm that underwent uneventful cataract surgery. Twelve IOL power calculation formulas were evaluated: SRK/T, Holladay 1, Haigis, Holladay 2, Barrett Universal II, Kane, EVO, Pearl-DGS, Hill RBF 3.0, SRK/T and Holladay 1 with the modified W-K AL adjustment, and Holladay 2 with the non-linear W-K AL adjustment. The median absolute error (MedAE), mean absolute error (MAE) and the percentage of eyes within specific prediction error thresholds were calculated and compared across formulas after adjusting the mean error to zero.
resultsHolladay 1
conclusionOur study reflects a superior accuracy of the Holladay 1
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.