ReviewBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2025
[AI-enabled clinical decision support systems: challenges and opportunities].
Review in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI Perceptions, Professional Identity, and AI-Supported Clinical Decisions Among Medical Students and Clinicians: Cross-Sectional Survey and Quasi-Randomized Vignette Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence in dyspnoea management for patients with advanced lung cancer: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- A Treatment Decision Model for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Based on Bayesian Networks.Cancers · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical decision-making is inherently complex, time-sensitive, and prone to error. AI-enabled clinical decision support systems (CDSS) offer promising solutions by leveraging large datasets to provide evidence-based recommendations. These systems range from rule-based and knowledge-based to increasingly AI-driven approaches. However, key challenges persist, particularly concerning data quality, seamless integration into clinical workflows, and clinician trust and acceptance. Ethical and legal considerations, especially data privacy, are also paramount.AI-CDSS have demonstrated success in fields like radiology (e.g., pulmonary nodule detection, mammography interpretation) and cardiology, where they enhance diagnostic accuracy and improve patient outcomes. Looking ahead, chat and voice interfaces powered by large language models (LLMs) could support shared decision-making (SDM) by fostering better patient engagement and understanding.To fully realize the potential of AI-CDSS in advancing efficient, patient-centered care, it is essential to ensure their responsible development. This includes grounding AI models in domain-specific data, anonymizing user inputs, and implementing rigorous validation of AI-generated outputs before presentation. Thoughtful design and ethical oversight will be critical to integrating AI safely and effectively into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.