ArticleInternational orthopaedics2025
What is the influence of tibial component posterior slope on clinical and radiographic outcomes following cemented medial unicompartmental fixed-bearing knee arthroplasty? A retrospective study with a minimum follow-up of five years.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robotic-Assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty restores native joint line height and reduces alignment outliers.International orthopaedics · 2025Pooled it
- Radiolucent lines after robotic-assisted surface-matching kinematically aligned UKA: short-term incidence and lack of association with tibial alignment.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Radiographic Posterior Tibial Slope Measurement in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Validation Study Using Digital Volume Tomography of Tibial Resectates.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate how changing the native posterior tibial slope (PTS) through implantation of a cemented medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) impacts clinical and radiographic outcomes, specifically whether it correlates with the occurrence of tibial periprosthetic radiolucency or tibial aseptic loosening (AL).
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed 63 patients with cemented medial UKAs with a minimum follow-up of five years. Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) included the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Radiographic parameters assessed were: PTS, mechanical axis, prosthetic joint space height, tibial component obliquity, intraprosthetic divergence, and tibial periprosthetic radiolucency. Partial Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between tibial periprosthetic radiolucency and demographic or radiographic parameters.
resultsOf 63 patients (mean age 68.9 ± 7.9 years, follow-up 62.5 ± 8.8 months), 5 knees (7.9%) demonstrated tibial periprosthetic radiolucency ≥ 2 mm. The mean postoperative PTS change was 3.8 ± 2.6°, mechanical axis change: 2.5 ± 1.8°, prosthetic joint space height: 9.2 ± 3.1 mm, tibial component obliquity: 2.5° ± 3°, and intraprosthetic divergence angle: 5° ± 4°. OKS averaged 43.9 (range 22-48), with a mean knee flexion of 123.4 ± 6.8°. Statistical analysis showed no significant associations between tibial periprosthetic radiolucency and demographics, radiographic parameters, or PROMs. Changes in PTS did not correlate with a range of motion (ROM), PROMs, or radiolucency.
conclusionIn our cohort, the deviation from native PTS following implantation of the cemented tibial component did not show a significant correlation with tibial periprosthetic radiolucency, PROMs, or ROM at mid-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.