ArticleInternational orthopaedics2025
The origins of limb lengthening and reconstruction surgery date back to 1521 when the first intervention ever reported in history was performed on St. Ignatius of Loyola.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Representation of Foot and Leg Healing in Art: A Historical Iconographic Perspective from the Sixth Century Onward.Journal of religion and health · 2026Article
- Sequential Limb Lengthening: A Novel Staged Approach Combining External Fixation and a Motorized Intramedullary Lengthening Nail for a Large Posttraumatic Tibial Defect.Case reports in orthopedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo explore the historical case of Saint Ignatius of Loyola's leg injury and subsequent surgical interventions as a potential early instance of limb lengthening and reconstruction surgery.
methodsA detailed analysis of "A Pilgrim's Journey" (Ignatius of Loyola's autobiography) was conducted, focusing on orthopaedic descriptions of his injury and treatments.
resultsIn 1521, Íñigo López de Loyola sustained a severe, comminuted open fracture of the tibia due to a cannonball wound during the siege of Pamplona. Initial attempts at reduction were unsuccessful, leading to a non-union with significant deformity and shortening. He underwent a revision surgery, a procedure described as "carnage" and endured without a single lament. Although the fracture eventually united, residual shortening and a prominent bone deformity persisted. Unwilling to accept this disfigurement for social reasons, Ignatius requested a second, highly painful osteotomy to remove the protruding bone followed by continuous traction for "days and days of martyrdom" for progressive lengthening. Crucially, after these arduous treatments, Ignatius was able to walk and even ride a horse again. The only significant residual symptom was swelling in his leg by evening.
conclusionSt. Ignatius of Loyola's case provides a compelling historical account of complex orthopaedic challenges in the early 16th century. The documented surgeries represent remarkably early attempts at managing non-union, deformity, and potentially achieving limb lengthening, predating modern reconstructive techniques by centuries. This historical narrative offers valuable insights into the nascent stages of orthopaedic surgery and highlights how a physical ordeal can profoundly shape one's life path.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.