ArticleArchives of toxicology2025
Comprehensive reexamination of the acute toxicity of nitrogen mustards: HN-1, HN-2 and HN-3 as blister agents: application of multi in silico approach.
Article in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- In Vivo Evaluation of Psoralen in a Copper Sulfate-Induced Chick (Gallus gallus domesticus) Emesis Model and In Silico Analysis of Its Interaction With DChemistryOpen · 2026Article
- Machine learning driven LDFrontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Amino alkyl-alkyl/aryl sulphides (DRDE-07 and analogues) as promising cytoprotectants for sulphur and nitrogen mustards - A review.Toxicology reports · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nitrogen mustards are potent alkylating agents originally developed as chemical warfare agents and later adapted for medical applications. Despite their well-documented toxicity, systematic studies on their acute toxicity profiles remain limited. Addressing this gap, the present study offers a comprehensive in silico evaluation of nitrogen mustards, employing both qualitative and quantitative computational models. Using advanced in silico tools, the toxicity of these compounds was assessed across multiple exposure routes, including oral, dermal, and inhalation pathways. Qualitative predictions conducted with STopTox, ADMETlab, and admetSAR consistently classified nitrogen mustards as highly toxic, particularly via inhalation and dermal exposure. Key toxicophores, such as ethylenimine moieties (-N(CH₂CH₂Cl)₂), were identified as primary contributors to their cytotoxicity and DNA alkylation potential. Quantitative analyses using TEST, ProTox-III, VEGA, QSAR Toolbox, and Percepta ACD/Labs revealed considerable variability in LD₅₀ and LC₅₀ estimates across different models. The LD₅₀ values confirmed the high toxicity potential of these compounds, with HN-2 emerging as the most hazardous, particularly in inhalation exposure scenarios. This study underscores the challenges associated with computational toxicity modeling, including inter-model variability and the dependence on structural analogs. Despite these limitations, in silico methodologies provide a rapid and cost-effective alternative to experimental toxicity assessments, helping to reduce reliance on in vivo testing. Further research should focus on refining predictive models, expanding training datasets, and integrating in vitro validation studies to enhance the accuracy of toxicity predictions. The findings highlight the critical role of computational toxicology in assessing chemical threats and developing mitigation strategies for nitrogen mustard exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.