ArticleNutrition reviews2025
Enablers and Challenges of Dietary Interventions and Change for Pacific Peoples Living in Aotearoa, New Zealand: A Scoping Review.
Article in Nutrition reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The impact and evolution of environmental/occupational, behavioural, and metabolic risk factors on CVD burdens in the Asia-Pacific region from 1990 to 2023: a secondary analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPacific Peoples face increasing rates of metabolic diseases, yet interventions for healthy dietary change are rarely focused on Pacific communities or centered around the cultural values and socio-cultural environment of Pacific Peoples.
objectiveIn this scoping review we aimed to systematically identify enablers and challenges of dietary change for Pacific Peoples in Aotearoa, New Zealand (AoNZ), and Australia. DATA SOURCES: Medline (OVID), Embase (OVID), Scopus, Indigenous health (informIT), CINAHL (EBSCO), NZ Research, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception until July 2021. DATA EXTRACTION: We performed this review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist, Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Of 10 963 articles identified, 19 were selected for review. Eight articles focused solely on Pacific Peoples and 11 included Pacific Peoples alongside other groups. Seventeen articles reported consultations with Pacific communities, utilized Pacific research methodology, or included authors of Pacific heritage. DATA SYNTHESIS: The Pacific Health model "Kato Polopola" (food basket) was utilized to synthesize the findings. This model includes 12 domains reflecting values commonly shared across Pacific Island cultures: family, community, church, and concepts, impacting the relationship between Pacific Peoples and food.
resultsKey enablers to engaging in positive dietary change centered on cultural values of Pacific communities: inclusion of the whole family; use of a holistic approach to physical and spiritual health; the significance of food in preserving cultural traditions; and co-design and facilitation performed with the Pacific Community. Crucially, the main challenges identified were primarily related to the social determinants of health and well-being.
conclusionDespite alarming health outcomes for Pacific Peoples living in AoNZ, this scoping review highlights the paucity of research addressing healthy dietary change for Pacific communities. Pacific-led research, based on Pacific values, is essential to promote meaningful change, alongside addressing the social determinants of health. This review provides a valuable basis for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.