ArticleTurkish journal of ophthalmology2025
Gonioscopy-Assisted Transluminal Trabeculotomy versus Bent Ab Interno Needle Goniectomy in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma.
Article in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phacoemulsification combined with bent ab interno needle goniectomy versus high-frequency deep sclerotomy: a comparative study of surgical outcomes in open-angle glaucoma.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Five-year results of illuminated microcatheter-assisted gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy in the Indian population - A retrospective study.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Surgical Success and Predictive Factors in Patients Undergoing Gonioscopy-Assisted Transluminal Trabeculotomy.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) and bent ab interno needle goniectomy (BANG) in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Materials and Methods: This retrospective comparative study included 65 eyes diagnosed with OAG that underwent GATT (34 eyes) or BANG (31 eyes). Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured using Goldmann applanation tonometry at baseline and during follow-up visits. Success was categorized as qualified (IOP ≤21 mmHg with ≥20% reduction) and complete (same criteria without medication). Complications and the need for further surgery were recorded. Results: Preoperative mean IOP was 32.9±6.1 mmHg for GATT and 31.8±5.4 mmHg for BANG. At the final visit, mean IOP was reduced to 15.8±4.5 mmHg in the GATT group (51.9% reduction) and 17.9±5.7 mmHg in the BANG group (43.7% reduction). The complete success rate was 88.2% for GATT and 61.3% for BANG. Early failures were more frequent in BANG, while GATT showed fewer but later failures. Both procedures had minimal complications, with transient hyphema being the most common. Conclusion: In this study, GATT provided greater and more sustained IOP reduction and higher long-term success rates compared to BANG, making it a more reliable option for managing OAG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.