Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40560015›Full record

ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2025

Structured Transformation of Unstructured Prostate MRI Reports Using Large Language Models.

Luca Di Palma, Fatemeh Darvizeh, Marco Alì, Deborah Fazzini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. [Research progress of large language models in tumor diagnosis: applications in textual reports and medical imaging].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. AI in Prostate MRI: A Task-Based Review.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luca Di PalmaCDI Centro Diagnostico Italiano, Saint Bon 20, 20147 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-0598-7354
Fatemeh DarvizehCDI Centro Diagnostico Italiano, Saint Bon 20, 20147 Milan, Italy.
Marco AlìCDI Centro Diagnostico Italiano, Saint Bon 20, 20147 Milan, Italy.
Deborah FazziniCDI Centro Diagnostico Italiano, Saint Bon 20, 20147 Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesto assess the ability of high-performing open-weight large language models (LLMs) in extracting key radiological features from prostate MRI reports.

methodsFive LLMs (Llama3.3, DeepSeek-R1-Llama3.3, Phi4, Gemma-2, and Qwen2.5-14B) were used to analyze free-text MRI reports retrieved from clinical practice. Each LLM processed reports three times using specialized prompts to extract (1) dimensions, (2) volume and PSA density, and (3) lesion characteristics. An experienced radiologist manually annotated the dataset, defining entities (Exam) and sub-entities (Lesion, Dimension). Feature- and physician-level performance were then assessed.

results250 MRI exams reported by 7 radiologists were analyzed by the LLMs. Feature-level performances showed that DeepSeek-R1-Llama3.3 exhibited the highest average score (98.6% ± 2.1%), followed by Phi4 (98.1% ± 2.2%), Llama3.3 (98.0% ± 3.0%), Qwen2.5 (97.5% ± 3.9%), and Gemma2 (96.0% ± 3.4%). All models excelled in extracting PSA density (100%) and volume (≥98.4%), while lesions' extraction showed greater variability (88.4-94.0%). LLMs' performance varied among radiologists: Physician B's reports yielded the highest mean score (99.9% ± 0.2%), while Physician C's resulted in the lowest (94.4% ± 2.3%).

conclusionsLLMs showed promising results in automated feature-extraction from radiology reports, with DeepSeek-R1-Llama3.3 achieving the highest overall score. These models can improve clinical workflows by structuring unstructured medical text. However, a preliminary analysis of reporting styles is necessary to identify potential challenges and optimize prompt design to better align with individual physician reporting styles. This approach can further enhance the robustness and adaptability of LLM-driven clinical data extraction.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNatural Language ProcessingProstateProstatic NeoplasmsHumansLarge Language ModelsMaleinformation extractionLLMMRIstructured reportunstructured medical text

Identifiers

PMID40560015
PMCPMC12196861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.