ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2025
Early Concepts in CT Image-Guided Robotic Vascular Surgery: The Displacement of Retroperitoneal Structures During Simulated Procedures in a Cadaveric Model.
Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Robotic-Assisted Vascular Surgery: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCT image guidance and navigation, although routinely used in complex endovascular procedures, is an unexplored territory in evolving vascular robotic procedures. In robotic surgery, it promises the better localization of vasculature, the optimization of port placement, less inadvertent tissue damage, and increased patient safety during the dissection of retroperitoneal structures. However, unknown tissue displacement resulting from induced pneumoperitoneum and positional changes compared to the preoperative CT scan can pose significant limitations to the reliability of image guidance. We aimed to study the displacement of retroperitoneal organs and vasculature due to factors such as increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) due to CO
methodsA thawed, fresh-frozen human cadaveric model was positioned according to simulated procedural workflows. Intra-arterial, contrast-enhanced CT scans were performed after the insertion of four laparoscopic ports in the abdomen. CT scans were performed with 0-5-15-25 mmHg IAPs in supine, left lateral decubitus, right lateral decubitus, Trendelenburg, and reverse Trendelenburg positions. Euclidean distances between fixed anatomical bony and retroperitoneal vascular landmarks were measured and compared across different CT scans.
resultsComparing the effects of various IAPs to the baseline (zero IAP) in the same PP, an average displacement for retroperitoneal vascular landmarks ranged from 0.6 to 3.0 mm (SD 1.0-2.8 mm). When changing the PPs while maintaining the same IAP, the average displacement of the retroperitoneal vasculature ranged from 2.0 to 15.0 mm (SD 1.7-7.2 mm).
conclusionsOur preliminary imaging findings from a single cadaveric model suggest minimal (~3 mm maximum) target vasculature displacement in the retroperitoneum due to elevated IAP in supine position and higher displacement due to changes in patient positioning. Similar imaging studies are needed to quantify procedural workflow-specific and anatomy-specific deformation, which would be invaluable in developing and validating advanced tissue deformation models, facilitating the routine applicability and usefulness of CT image guidance for target delineation during robotic vascular procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.