ArticleToxics2025
Safety Assessment of Cassava Pulp-Derived Dietary Fiber: Acute and Sub-Acute Toxicity Evaluation.
Article in Toxics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study rigorously evaluated the safety profile of dietary fiber extracted from cassava pulp, a promising functional food ingredient, through acute and 28-day sub-acute oral toxicity assessments in Wistar rats. This research hypothesized that cassava pulp fiber would exhibit minimal toxicity across a range of doses. In the acute study, rats received single oral doses of 175, 550, or 2000 mg/kg, while the sub-acute toxicity study involved daily doses of 250, 500, or 1000 mg/kg, with satellite groups included for reversibility assessment. Comprehensive monitoring encompassed clinical signs, mortality, body weight, food intake, hematological and biochemical parameters, relative organ weights, and detailed histopathological examination. Remarkably, no treatment-related mortality or overt clinical signs of toxicity were observed in either study. The LD
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.