Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40559894›Full record

ReviewToxics2025

Aerotoxic Syndrome-Susceptibility and Recovery.

Jeremy J Ramsden

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Xenobiotic Hazards in Aircraft Cabin Air.Journal of xenobiotics · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jeremy J RamsdenDepartment of Biomedical Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, The University of Buckingham, Buckingham MK18 1EG, UK.

Funding

Collegium Basilea (Institute of Advanced Study) none
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant numbers of aircrew and jet airline passengers are affected by post-flight symptoms of ill health, usually nowadays labelled "aerotoxic syndrome". It could be inferred from a large passenger survey carried out in the Netherlands that up to 50% of flights may engender malaise to varying degrees, and up to 50% of the population might be susceptible to suffering from actual intoxication from the contaminants known to occur in aircraft cabin air. In-flight measurements of its composition have revealed the presence of known neurotoxins, notably tricresyl phosphate and carbon monoxide, both of which can enter the cabin air as it is bled off the main engines. This study reviews the quantitative aspects of this evidence and estimates the susceptibility of the population to neurological damage at the measured levels of contamination, its typical impacts on health, and the likelihood and timescales of post-exposure recovery. Airworthiness directives already mandate that crew and passenger compartment air must be free from harmful or hazardous vapours and gases, but uncertainty regarding the nature of these particular hazards has led to this important aspect of airworthiness having been hitherto unduly neglected. The continuing exponential growth of air passenger traffic means that cabin air contamination will eventually become a major public health hazard if effective action is not taken, some possible courses of which are discussed.

Indexed as

aircraft maintenancecarbon monoxidederegulationfume eventsinhalation toxicitytricresyl phosphate

Identifiers

PMID40559894
PMCPMC12196834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.