Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40559823›Full record

ReviewVeterinary sciences2025

Interspecies Relational Theory: A Framework for Compassionate Interspecies Interactions.

Emily Kieson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Emily KiesonEquine International, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0858-1343

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most studies on relationships between humans and nonhuman animals focus on the benefits of the relationship to humans, the potential detriment or stress to animals, or how humans can better improve husbandry or handling practices in the domestic setting. By comparing existing research in human working relationships and friendships with animal friendships and studies on human-animal interactions, this paper proposes a new framework of an Interspecies Relational Theory that provides approaches for identifying, developing, and maintaining different levels of relationships between humans and nonhuman species. The framework is broken into three stages aligned with existing research in human levels of trust ranging from strategic/calculus-based to working/knowledge/information-based to friendship/affect-based. These levels are also aligned with stages of Maslow's Hierarchy. The suggested framework can help provide insight into both human and animal perspectives of the human-animal relationship in a variety of veterinary and animal-assisted settings.

Indexed as

animal-assistedanimal–human bondanimal–human communicationanimal welfareintraspecies relationshipswellbeing

Identifiers

PMID40559823
PMCPMC12197473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.