ArticleVeterinary sciences2025
Etiological Detection, Isolation, and Pathogenicity of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus in China.
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chandipura virus encephalitis: an emerging pediatric neurotropic threat in india-virology, epidemiology, pathogenesis, and public health challenges.Journal of neurovirology · 2026Review
- Repeated Cross-Sectional Surveillance and ORF5-Based Molecular Epidemiology of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus in Anhui Province, China, 2019-2024.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Isolation, Genomic Characterization and Pathogenicity of a European-Like PRRSV-1 Strain in Newborn Piglets from Southwestern China.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Due to its high genomic variability, the epidemiological landscape of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) has become increasingly complex in recent years. From 2022 to 2023, we collected a total of 1044 clinical samples from pigs suspected of PRRSV infection in China and discovered a PRRSV-positive rate of 29.8% (311/1044) using RT-PCR targeting the nsp2 gene. Among these positive samples, NADC30/34-like PRRSV, highly pathogenic PRRSV (HP-PRRSV), and classical PRRSV strains accounted for 60.1%, 37.9%, and 4.5%, respectively. These results indicate that the most prevalent PRRSV strains in China are NADC30/34-like PRRSV, followed by HP-PRRSV. Two PRRSV strains, JX03 and HN08, were isolated, and TCID
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.