ArticleSports (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Old Habits Die Hard: Kinematic Carryover Between Low- and High-Impact Tasks in Active Females.
Article in Sports (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKnee injury risk screening protocols predominantly employ high-impact tasks (HIT), but there is a need for low-impact movement screening alternatives. This study aimed to investigate kinematic carryover between low-impact tasks (LIT) and HIT.
methodsThis study employed a cross-sectional design. Eighteen healthy, active females with no history of injury within the last six months, aged between 18-35 years completed three trials of LIT (stand-to-sit, single-leg stand-to-sit) and HIT (drop vertical jump, single-leg drop vertical jump). Hip and knee three-dimensional kinematics were evaluated during LIT and HIT. Pearson correlation analyses were used to assess kinematic relationships between LIT and HIT. A post-hoc exploratory analysis examined the consistency of kinematic directionality across tasks.
resultsIn the frontal plane, the dominant hip, dominant knee, and non-dominant knee during LIT demonstrated a strong positive correlation and directional consistency with the corresponding values during HITs (
conclusionThe similarities in hip and knee kinematic patterns suggest that motor responses may generalize across varying task intensities. Thus, LITs may be a useful tool in early knee injury risk identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.