Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40559662›Full record

ReviewMarine drugs2025

Prickly Defenders: A Review of Venomous Sea Urchins (Echinoidea).

Sina Ehlert-Flaskämper, Cherie A Motti, Richard J Harris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Marine drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sina Ehlert-FlaskämperCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4814, Australia.
Cherie A MottiAIMS@JCU, Division of Innovation, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4814, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3292-2785
Richard J HarrisAIMS@JCU, Division of Innovation, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4814, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4412-2275

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sea urchins, Echinoidea, are widely known for their defensive spines and pedicellariae, with some species having co-evolved venom in conjunction with those appendages. Despite this, their venomous arsenal remains poorly understood. Research has predominately focused on pedicellariae venom, while the spines have been largely neglected within studies. This review consolidates current knowledge of the venom systems (spines and pedicellariae) of sea urchins, focusing on the morphology, known venom components, and their functional effects. While early studies have established the bioactivity of crude extracts and fractions, along with the partial characterisation of some toxins, most of these studies are outdated and were conducted with very basic methodologies. Modern venomics presents an opportunity to meet this challenge, enabling development of a comprehensive database on venomous urchins and their toxins. This advancement will facilitate research into targeted early treatments and therapies for victims of sea urchin stings, ultimately improving health outcomes and enhancing our scientific understanding of venom toxins and their broader implications for human health and bioinnovation.

Indexed as

Sea UrchinsVenomsAnimalsHumansVenomsdefenceechinodermsechinoideatoxinurchinvenom

Identifiers

PMID40559662
PMCPMC12193733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.