ArticleMethods and protocols2025
Cystic Lung Phantom to Validate Clinical CT Protocols.
Article in Methods and protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In computed tomography (CT)-based evaluation of the extent of cystic changes in the lungs of patients with cystic lung diseases, such as Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM), there is a lack of a lung phantom containing air-filled cavities that mimic pulmonary cysts to calibrate the measurement of cystic volumes from CT scans. We describe an easy-to-replicate cystic lung phantom consisting of basic lung structures of a trachea and two lung compartments. The lung compartments contain air cavities of varying sizes to mimic cystic lesions. The lung compartments are made of a foam material recommended by NIST to simulate the radiodensity of human lung parenchyma. In tests performed on a clinical scanner, various structures in the lung phantom were correctly recognized by two types of lung analysis software. The resulting cystic volume measurements revealed the relationship between the size of the cysts and the accuracy of the measurement. The significant finding was that the volumes of individual cysts were underestimated for small cysts. The error increased with decreasing cyst sizes. Such underestimation has not been mentioned previously and deserves the attention of clinicians using CT scans to assess the cyst burden in the lungs, particularly in patients presenting with numerous small pulmonary cysts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.