ArticleMembranes2025
Membrane Charge Effects on Solute Transport in Nanofiltration: Experiments and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
Article in Membranes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Charged Functional Groups Drive Nanofiltration LiMembranes · 2026Article
- Investigations on the Recovery of Different Structure Types of Polyoxometalates from Aqueous Solution Using Nanofiltration Membranes.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Advanced biomimetic nanofiltration membranes for lithium recovery with anti-janus charge structure.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polyamide membranes, such as nanofiltration (NF) membranes, are widely used for water purification. However, the mechanisms of solute transport and solute rejection due to solute charge interactions with the membrane remain unclear at the molecular level. Here, we use molecular dynamics simulations to examine the transport of single-solute feeds through charged nanofiltration membranes with different membrane charge concentrations of COO- and NH+2 resulting from the deprotonation or protonation of polymeric end groups according to the pH level that the membrane experiences. The results show that Na+ and Cl- solute ions are better rejected when the membrane has a higher concentration of negatively charged groups, corresponding to a higher pH, whereas CaCl2 is well rejected at all pH levels studied. These results are consistent with those of experiments performed at the same pH conditions as the simulation setup. Moreover, solute transport behavior depends on the membrane functional group distribution. When COO- functional groups are concentrated at membrane feed surface, ion permeation into the membrane is reduced. Counter-ions tend to associate with charged functional groups while co-ions seem to pass by the charged groups more easily. In addition, steric effects play a role when ions of opposite charge cluster in pores of the membrane. This study reveals solute transport and rejection mechanisms related to membrane charge and provides insights into how membranes might be designed to achieve specific desired solute rejection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.