ArticleMembranes2025
Impact of Additives on Poly(acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene) Membrane Formation Process Using Non-Solvent-Induced Phase Separation.
Article in Membranes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multifunctional PVDF membranes incorporating graphene, TiORSC advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Poly(acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene) (ABS) is a common polymer used in toys, automobile parts, and membranes. Membranes fabricated with this copolymer commonly employ toxic solvents and have a dense architecture, which may not work in all applications. This work investigates the synthesis of ABS membranes, using green solvents and the influence of additives on the phase inversion process during the non-solvent-induced phase separation. The addition of water-soluble additives, ethanol, and acetone is hypothesized to provide additional control over viscosity and volatility, and, consequently, impact the phase inversion process. Membranes were fabricated with PolarClean and with various additive concentrations and evaporation times. The resulting membranes were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and a pycnometer to visualize the pore structure and obtain porosity information. Membrane performance, including water flux and bovine serum albumin rejection, was evaluated using dead-end cell filtration. Membranes fabricated using only PolarClean had fingerlike pore morphology and relatively low protein rejection. The addition of additives resulted in a change in pore architecture and rejection, which is hypothesized to be a result of additives' volatility, humidity, and destabilization of liquid-liquid separation. This study provides a more detailed understanding of the impact of additives on the resulting ABS membrane structure and performance, with a focus on safer solvents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.