ReviewMembranes2025
Machine Learning in the Design and Performance Prediction of Organic Framework Membranes: Methodologies, Applications, and Industrial Prospects.
Review in Membranes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transformational Catalytic Innovation Supports COChemistryOpen · 2026Review
- Integrated counter current separation and omics approaches for discovery of bioactive compounds from medicinal plants.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Organic framework membranes (OFMs) have emerged as transformative materials for separation technologies due to their tunable porosity, structural diversity, and stability, yet their design and optimization face challenges in navigating vast chemical spaces and complex performance trade-offs. This review highlights the pivotal role of machine learning (ML) in overcoming these limitations by integrating multi-source data, constructing quantitative structure-property relationships, and enabling the cross-scale optimization of OFMs. Methodologically, ML workflows-spanning data construction, feature engineering, and model optimization-accelerate candidate screening, inverse design, and mechanistic interpretation, as demonstrated in gas separations and nascent liquid-phase applications. Key findings reveal that ML identifies critical structural descriptors and environmental parameters, guiding the development of high-performance membranes that surpass traditional selectivity-permeability limits. Challenges persist in liquid separations due to dynamic operational complexities and data scarcity, while emerging frameworks offer untapped potential. The integration of interpretable ML, in situ characterization, and industrial scalability strategies is essential to transition OFMs from laboratory innovations to sustainable, adaptive separation systems. This review underscores ML's transformative capacity to bridge computational insights with experimental validation, fostering next-generation membranes for carbon neutrality, water security, and energy-efficient industrial processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.