ArticleMembranes2025
Prediction of Expected Fouling Time During Transmembrane Transition in Reverse Osmosis Systems.
Article in Membranes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Membrane filtration, including reverse osmosis filtration, is widely applied in water treatment worldwide, offering solutions to a broad range of separation challenges. However, due to the porous structure of membranes, they are prone to fouling, which reduces their efficiency and can eventually render the membranes incapable of functioning. In such cases, a systemic intervention becomes necessary, highlighting the importance of accurately predicting the expected fouling time. Various approaches for estimating fouling processes and times are well documented in the literature. However, a common limitation of these methods is that they typically assume constant and well-defined operating parameters over time. Under such stable conditions, the process can be described deterministically, and the fouling time can be predicted using straightforward extrapolation techniques. However, in industrial practice, process conditions often fluctuate due to multiple influencing factors, making fouling time a variable quantity. Therefore, it can be more appropriately treated as a random variable characterized by a mean value and standard deviation. Rather than predicting a precise fouling time, it is more relevant to define a probabilistic interval within which the fouling is expected to occur with a specified confidence level (e.g., 95%). The associated maintenance scheduling can then be optimized based on economic criteria. The probability-based model presented herein defines this interval based on operational measurements, thereby providing users with a time window during which maintenance should be planned. From this point forward, the exact timing of interventions becomes a matter of technical feasibility and economic optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.