Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40559349›Full record

ArticleMembranes2025

Prediction of Expected Fouling Time During Transmembrane Transition in Reverse Osmosis Systems.

Jozsef Lakner, Gabor Lakner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jozsef LaknerHidrofilt Water Treatment Ltd., Magyar u. 191, H-8800 Nagykanizsa, Hungary.
Gabor LaknerHidrofilt Water Treatment Ltd., Magyar u. 191, H-8800 Nagykanizsa, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Membrane filtration, including reverse osmosis filtration, is widely applied in water treatment worldwide, offering solutions to a broad range of separation challenges. However, due to the porous structure of membranes, they are prone to fouling, which reduces their efficiency and can eventually render the membranes incapable of functioning. In such cases, a systemic intervention becomes necessary, highlighting the importance of accurately predicting the expected fouling time. Various approaches for estimating fouling processes and times are well documented in the literature. However, a common limitation of these methods is that they typically assume constant and well-defined operating parameters over time. Under such stable conditions, the process can be described deterministically, and the fouling time can be predicted using straightforward extrapolation techniques. However, in industrial practice, process conditions often fluctuate due to multiple influencing factors, making fouling time a variable quantity. Therefore, it can be more appropriately treated as a random variable characterized by a mean value and standard deviation. Rather than predicting a precise fouling time, it is more relevant to define a probabilistic interval within which the fouling is expected to occur with a specified confidence level (e.g., 95%). The associated maintenance scheduling can then be optimized based on economic criteria. The probability-based model presented herein defines this interval based on operational measurements, thereby providing users with a time window during which maintenance should be planned. From this point forward, the exact timing of interventions becomes a matter of technical feasibility and economic optimization.

Indexed as

cost estimationfouling time predictionmaintenance optimizationmembrane foulingnormal distributionprobabilistic modellingreverse osmosis

Identifiers

PMID40559349
PMCPMC12194824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.