Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40559347›Full record

ArticleMembranes2025

Exploring Nanofiltration for Transport of Small Molecular Species for Application in Artificial Kidney Devices to Treat End-Stage Kidney Disease.

Haley Duncan, Christopher Newton, Jamie Hestekin, Christa Hestekin, Ira Kurtz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Haley DuncanRalph E. Martin Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-7067-5740
Christopher NewtonRalph E. Martin Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Jamie HestekinRalph E. Martin Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.
Christa HestekinRalph E. Martin Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5035-7273
Ira KurtzDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

Funding

The Biology of NBCe1 in Health and DiseaseR01DK077162 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI IRA KURTZ · 2007 to 2026
$6.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK077162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

End-stage renal disease occurs when there is permanent loss of the kidney's ability to filter toxins from the blood. Due to the limited number of transplants, dialysis is currently the most common treatment, but it significantly limits a patient's lifestyle and has significant side effects. One solution is an artificial kidney, but significant challenges remain in its development. One challenge is the separation of glucose from urea. Nanofiltration is ideal for this separation; however, there is little understanding of the important parameters for this separation under physiological conditions. In this study, operating parameters (pressure and temperature) as well as feed conditions (increased glucose/salt) were explored for their effects on the separation of glucose from urea in six commercial membranes. The rejection of monovalent and divalent ions was also characterized. While increasing pressure increased flux, it had little effect on metabolite rejection, except for glucose, which increased above 20 psi. Increasing temperature led to a slight increase in flux and a slight decrease in the rejection of divalent ions. Glucose rejection was sensitive to feed conditions, while urea rejection was less affected. Divalent ions were rejected more strongly than monovalent ions and were also more affected by feed conditions.

Indexed as

divalent ionsfluxglucosekidney diseasemonovalent ionnanofiltrationurea

Identifiers

PMID40559347
PMCPMC12195112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.