ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
In Situ Characterization Method to Reveal the Surface Reconstruction Process of an Electrocatalyst.
Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strategies Enhancing the Efficiency of CoFe-Based Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Alkaline.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2026Review
- Transformational Catalytic Innovation Supports COChemistryOpen · 2026Review
- Charge Storage Mechanisms in Redox-Active Polymer Brushes.Macromolecules · 2026Article
- Oxygen Bridge Governs OER via Deep Self-Reconstruction in Fe-Co Oxyhydroxides.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Renewable energy-driven water electrolysis is widely regarded as a pivotal approach for achieving carbon-free hydrogen production. The development of highly efficient electrocatalysts is crucial to advancing the efficiency and scalability of electrolytic water splitting. Recent advancements in characterization techniques have revealed that catalysts often undergo surface reconstruction during the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER), leading to the formation of real active species. Understanding the surface reconstruction process through advanced characterization methods is essential for the rational design of high-performance catalysts. However, the surface reconstruction of catalysts is a highly complex phenomenon, and conventional ex situ characterization techniques often fall short of capturing the dynamic evolution of the catalyst surface. Consequently, in situ characterization methods have emerged as indispensable tools for elucidating the surface reconstruction process. This paper provides a detailed review of the process of surface reconstruction, the reasons behind it, and the in situ characterization methods, and finally discusses the challenges faced by the characterization methods for the reconstruction of water electrolysis catalysts in future development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.