ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Long-Range Interactions Between Neighboring Nanoparticles Tuned by Confining Membranes.
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Membrane tubes, a class of soft biological confinement for ubiquitous transport intermediates, are essential for cell trafficking and intercellular communication. However, the confinement interaction and directional migration of diffusive nanoparticles (NPs) are widely dismissed as improbable due to the surrounding environment compressive force. Here, combined with the mechanics analysis of nanoparticles (such as extracellular vesicles, EVs) to study their interaction in confinement, we perform dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) simulations to construct a model that is as large as possible to clarify the submissive behavior of NPs. Both molecular simulations and mechanical analysis revealed that the interactions between NPs are controlled by confinement deformation and the centroid distance of the NPs. When the centroid distance exceeds a threshold value, the degree of crowding variation becomes invalid for NPs motion. The above conclusions are further supported by the observed dynamics of multiple NPs under confinement. These findings provide new insights into the physical mechanism, revealing that the confinement squeeze generated by asymmetric deformation serves as the key factor governing the directional movement of the NPs. Therefore, the constraints acting on NPs differ between rigid confinement and soft confinement environments, with NPs maintaining relative stillness in rigid confinement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.