ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Comparative Study of Water Flow in Nanopores with Different Quartz (101¯0) Surfaces via Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dewatering and gas production are applied on a large scale in shale gas development. The fundamental mechanisms of water flow in shale nanoporous media are essential for the development of shale oil and gas resources. In this work, we use molecular dynamic simulations to investigate water flow in two different quartz surface ((101¯0)-α and (101¯0)-β) nanopores. Results show that the (101¯0)-β surface exhibits stronger water molecule structuring with a structure arranged in two layers and higher first-layer adsorption density (2.44 g/cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.