Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40559224›Full record

ArticleMedical sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Trends and Disparities in Liver Transplantation in the United States: A Nationwide Analysis of Demographic, Clinical, and Socioeconomic Factors (2016-2021).

Vignesh Krishnan Nagesh, Vivek Joseph Varughese, Marina Basta, Emelyn Martinez, Shruthi Badam, Lokaesh Subramani Shobana, Abdifitah Mohamed, Alin J, Simcha Weissman, Adam Atoot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Alcohol-related liver disease and access to liver transplantation: where we stand and where we should go.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Vignesh Krishnan NageshDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hackensack Palisades Medical Center, North Bergen, NJ 07047, USA.
Vivek Joseph VarugheseDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Marina BastaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hackensack Palisades Medical Center, North Bergen, NJ 07047, USA.
Emelyn MartinezDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hackensack Palisades Medical Center, North Bergen, NJ 07047, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-6630-0299
Shruthi BadamDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hackensack Palisades Medical Center, North Bergen, NJ 07047, USA.
Lokaesh Subramani ShobanaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hackensack Palisades Medical Center, North Bergen, NJ 07047, USA.
Abdifitah MohamedDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8909-7424
Alin JDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical College Thiruvananthapuram, Thiruvananthapuram 695011, Kerala, India.
Simcha WeissmanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hackensack Palisades Medical Center, North Bergen, NJ 07047, USA.
Adam AtootDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hackensack Palisades Medical Center, North Bergen, NJ 07047, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiver transplantation has become the standard of care for patients with end-stage liver disease. Despite advances in surgical techniques, immunosuppression, and perioperative care, disparities in access and outcomes persist across demographic and socioeconomic lines.

objectiveTo assess trends and disparities in liver transplant admissions in the United States from 2016 to 2021, examining demographic patterns, in-hospital mortality, hospital charges, length of stay, and socioeconomic factors.

methodsUsing the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2016 to 2021, we identified liver transplant admissions using ICD-10 PCS codes 0FY00Z1 and 0FY00Z2. Demographic characteristics (age, sex, race, insurance status, and income quartile), clinical outcomes, and resource utilization metrics were analyzed. One-way ANOVA and Hensel's test were used to assess variance and distribution homogeneity, with a significance threshold of

resultsA total of 9677 liver transplant admissions were analyzed. The mean recipient age remained stable (51-52 years), with males comprising ~62% of transplants. White patients constituted the largest group of recipients (~66-68%), followed by Hispanic (~14-17%) and Black patients (~7-10%). The proportion of transplants relative to liver failure admissions remained stable across racial groups, indicating no widening racial gap during the study period. In-hospital mortality post-transplant remained low (2.37-3.52%) and did not differ significantly by race (

conclusionsLiver transplantation outcomes, including in-hospital mortality, appear consistent across demographic and socioeconomic groups once patients are admitted for transplant. However, broader disparities in access persist, necessitating further research into pre-transplant barriers and long-term outcomes. These findings support the need for equitable healthcare strategies aimed at optimizing transplant candidacy and survival across all populations.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesLiver TransplantationAdultAgedFemaleHospital MortalityHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsUnited Stateshealthcare accessin-hospital mortalityliver transplantationnational inpatient sample (NIS)racial disparities

Identifiers

PMID40559224
PMCPMC12195059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.