Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40559154›Full record

ReviewDentistry journal2025

Transposed Maxillary Canines: Narrative Review with Clinical Case Report.

Teresa Pinho, Rui Amaral

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dentistry journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Teresa PinhoUNIPRO-Oral Pathology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, University Institute of Health Science (IUCS), 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0012-6626
Rui AmaralUNIPRO-Oral Pathology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, University Institute of Health Science (IUCS), 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal.ORCID 0009-0008-2569-5941

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Permanent maxillary canines are key teeth from both functional and aesthetic perspectives. Tooth transposition, a rare anomaly where two permanent teeth exchange positions within the same quadrant, poses significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This study aimed to identify the clinical conditions guiding the decision to correct or maintain maxillary canine transposition through a narrative review of the literature, complemented by a detailed clinical case. Following PRISMA guidelines, a search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, and Scopus databases (2014-May 2024) yielded 19 relevant studies. This review found no consensus on treatment protocols, reinforcing the need for individualized decision-making based on patient characteristics, anatomical constraints, and clinician expertise. While orthodontic correction can yield favorable aesthetic outcomes, it requires meticulous planning and biomechanical control. Conservative approaches are often indicated in early-diagnosed or anatomically complex cases. The clinical case illustrates the complexity of managing the transposition, specifically of the maxillary canine into the central incisor position, emphasizing the importance of early diagnosis, digital planning, and a multidisciplinary approach for functional and aesthetic success.

Indexed as

cuspidectopicmaxillaorthodonticstooth eruption

Identifiers

PMID40559154
PMCPMC12191671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.