Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40559032›Full record

ArticleInsects2025

Assessing the Conservation Priority of Alpine Carabid Beetle Communities by Mapping the Index of Natural Value (INV) in Natura 2000 Habitats in the Brenta Dolomites (Italian Alps).

Emiliano Peretti, Marco Armanini, Roberta Chirichella, Andrea Mustoni, Mauro Gobbi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insects, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emiliano PerettiClimate and Ecology Unit, Research and Museum Collections Office, MUSE-Science Museum, 38122 Trento, Italy.
Marco ArmaniniAdamello Brenta Nature Park, Via Nazionale 12, 38080 Strembo, Italy.
Roberta ChirichellaDepartment of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Sassari, Via Roma 151, 07100 Sassari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6734-5319
Andrea MustoniAdamello Brenta Nature Park, Via Nazionale 12, 38080 Strembo, Italy.
Mauro GobbiClimate and Ecology Unit, Research and Museum Collections Office, MUSE-Science Museum, 38122 Trento, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1704-4857

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Dolomites (European Alps) are a UNESCO World Heritage Site known to harbor distinctive communities of carabid beetles adapted to high-altitude environments, whose composition is shaped mainly by landform and habitat type. We aimed to assess the conservation priority of carabid beetle communities in the Brenta mountain group (Italy). We used the Index of Natural Value (INV), based on the relative frequencies and abundances of highly specialized Alpine species, as a proxy of the sensitivity to disturbance, and, thus, to the vulnerability of the carabid beetle communities to extinction. We used information on Natura 2000 habitat cover to produce a map for identifying areas of the Brenta Dolomites inhabited by the carabid beetle communities most relevant for conservation. We also report on the main differences in terms of species composition between the investigated communities. We found a positive correlation between vulnerability and altitude. Specifically, the most vulnerable communities were recorded in high-altitude habitat types (limestone cliffs and pavements, calcareous and calcschist screes, and alpine calcareous grasslands). Alkaline fens resulted in having the least vulnerable community, while those in all other habitats (bush and forests) were found to have intermediate levels of vulnerability.

Indexed as

AlpsCarabidaeColeopteracommunity ecologyground beetlesmountain ecologypriority areasspecies traitsUNESCO World Heritage Site

Identifiers

PMID40559032
PMCPMC12193764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.