ArticleInsects2025
Exploratory Study on DNA Barcode Combined with PCR-HRM Technology for Rapid and Accurate Identification of Necrophilous Fly Species.
Article in Insects, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Molecular species identification plays an increasingly important role in forensic entomology and is centered on selecting appropriate DNA barcodes, which there are not yet enough of. Such identification is decisive in discovering a better DNA barcode for the identification of necrophilous fly species. Here, we analyzed 10 common necrophilous fly species found on Hainan Island; designed 12 pairs of fly-specific primers from different mitochondrial regions; screened two fly DNA barcodes with better results than those of published studies, which were used as controls; and employed a high-resolution melting (HRM) curve to construct PCR-HRM technology systems for rapid and efficient necrophilous fly species identification. The results showed that, among the 14 DNA barcoding PCR-HRM systems, the newly designed COXII-519/COXII-615 primer was the best, which identified 10 necrophilous fly species in one test. The second-best system was the C1-J-2495/C1-N-2800 primer published in the literature, which identified six fly species in one test. Moreover, since the COXII-519/COXII-615 primer system performed successfully in both stale (stored over two years) and larval samples due to its short amplificated fragment (shorter than 97 bp), it may serve as a new efficient DNA barcode for necrophilic fly species identification. The new DNA barcoding PCR-HRM system established in this study enables the rapid and accurate identification of necrophilic fly species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.