Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40558820›Full record

ArticleJournal of Intelligence2025

Emotional Factors in the Psychological Well-Being of Future Teachers: A Structural Model.

Raquel Gilar-Corbi, Andrea Izquierdo, Juan-Luis Castejón

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raquel Gilar-CorbiDepartment of Developmental Psychology and Didactics, University of Alicante, 03080 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2209-4429
Andrea IzquierdoDepartment of Developmental Psychology and Didactics, University of Alicante, 03080 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1323-8689
Juan-Luis CastejónDepartment of Developmental Psychology and Didactics, University of Alicante, 03080 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0743-0882

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/FEDER, EU (Ref. PID2021-125279OB-I00)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientific research has examined relationships between various emotional factors in teachers; however, few studies have analyzed these relationships jointly. This study aimed to explore mechanisms through which emotional intelligence, resilience, stress, and burnout influence the psychological well-being of 338 trainee teachers (comprising 72.8% women) from the University of Alicante. Structural equation modeling was used to assess the direct and indirect effects among the variables included in the model. The instruments employed were the Trait Meta-Mood Scale, the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, the Perceived Stress Scale, the Maslach Burnout Inventory, and Ryff's Psychological Well-being Scale. The results indicated that resilience had a direct and positive effect on psychological well-being, while burnout had a direct but negative effect. In addition, emotional intelligence and stress influenced psychological well-being indirectly: emotional intelligence exerted a positive impact through resilience, whereas stress had a negative impact through burnout. The model explained a high percentage (85.3%) of variance in psychological well-being. This study provides empirical evidence on how these variables interact and highlights the importance of incorporating these abilities into teacher training programs to enhance teachers' psychological well-being and thereby improve the quality of the educational process.

Indexed as

burnoutemotional intelligencepsychological well-beingresiliencestressstructural equation analysisteacher developmenttrainee teacher

Identifiers

PMID40558820
PMCPMC12194500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.