Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40558809›Full record

ReviewJournal of Intelligence2025

Determining Factors for the Development of Critical Thinking in Higher Education.

Dora Lucia Jaramillo Gómez, Annie Julieth Álvarez Maestre, Abad Ernesto Parada Trujillo, Carlos Alfredo Pérez Fuentes, Dago Hernando Bedoya Ortiz, Ruth Katherine Sanabria Alarcón

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dora Lucia Jaramillo GómezPhD Program, Doctorado en Educación y Estudios Sociales, Tecnológico de Antioquia Institución Universitaria, Medellín 050034, Colombia.ORCID 0009-0000-9419-9409
Annie Julieth Álvarez MaestrePsychology Program, Tecnológico de Antioquia Institución Universitaria, Medellín 050034, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-9432-8554
Abad Ernesto Parada TrujilloSocial Work Program, Tecnológico de Antioquia Institución Universitaria, Medellín 050034, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-9665-6105
Carlos Alfredo Pérez FuentesFacultad de Derecho y Ciencias Forenses, Tecnológico de Antioquia Institución Universitaria, Medellín 050034, Colombia.
Dago Hernando Bedoya OrtizFacultad de Ingeniería, Tecnológico de Antioquia Institución Universitaria, Medellín 050034, Colombia.ORCID 0009-0001-6769-4778
Ruth Katherine Sanabria AlarcónHealth Sciences, UCAM-Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia, 30107 Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3433-1943

Funding

Tecnológico de Antioquia Acta N°1 of January 26, 2023, 206001364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study arises from the growing need to train professionals capable of confronting and analyzing the overabundance of information in an increasingly complex world, where critical thinking is seen as an indispensable skill for informed decision making and problem solving. To this end, a systematic narrative review methodology was applied to the scientific literature, compiling data from various international databases. The results reveal that physiological factors (memory, attention, nutrition and physical activity), psychological factors (cognitive biases, fear of ambiguity, and metacognition), sociocultural factors (diversity, inequality, and cultural norms), technological factors (digitalization, use of AI, and digital literacy), and educational factors (active pedagogical strategies and collaborative work) play a determining role in the development of critical thinking in higher education. The discussion emphasizes the complex interaction between these factors and underscores the need for holistic approaches that strengthen both cognitive competencies and emotional well-being. In conclusion, we recommend designing comprehensive training interventions that consider the identified factors, promoting inclusive and reflective environments, aimed at developing critical, autonomous graduates capable of facing contemporary challenges.

Indexed as

critical thinkinghigher educationuniversity

Identifiers

PMID40558809
PMCPMC12193751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.