ReviewJournal of imaging2025
Inferring Body Measurements from 2D Images: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in public health-challenges and opportunities.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prediction of anthropometric measurements from 2D body images, particularly for children, remains an under-explored area despite its potential applications in healthcare, fashion, and fitness. While pose estimation and body shape classification have garnered extensive attention, estimating body measurements and body mass index (BMI) from images presents unique challenges and opportunities. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the current methodologies, focusing on deep-learning approaches, both standalone and in combination with traditional machine-learning techniques, for inferring body measurements from facial and full-body images. We discuss the strengths and limitations of commonly used datasets, proposing the need for more inclusive and diverse collections to improve model performance. Our findings indicate that deep-learning models, especially when combined with traditional machine-learning techniques, offer the most accurate predictions. We further highlight the promise of vision transformers in advancing the field while stressing the importance of addressing model explainability. Finally, we evaluate the current state of the field, comparing recent results and focusing on the deviations from ground truth, ultimately providing recommendations for future research directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.