ArticleJournal of imaging2025
Automation of Multi-Class Microscopy Image Classification Based on the Microorganisms Taxonomic Features Extraction.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Overcoming resolution constraints in automated colony counting via a high-performance deep learning framework using SAHI.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents a unified low-parameter approach to multi-class classification of microorganisms (micrococci, diplococci, streptococci, and bacilli) based on automated machine learning. The method is designed to produce interpretable taxonomic descriptors through analysis of the external geometric characteristics of microorganisms, including cell shape, colony organization, and dynamic behavior in unfixed microscopic scenes. A key advantage of the proposed approach is its lightweight nature: the resulting models have significantly fewer parameters than deep learning-based alternatives, enabling fast inference even on standard CPU hardware. An annotated dataset containing images of four bacterial types obtained under conditions simulating real clinical trials has been developed and published to validate the method. The results (Precision = 0.910, Recall = 0.901, and F1-score = 0.905) confirm the effectiveness of the proposed method for biomedical diagnostic tasks, especially in settings with limited computational resources and a need for feature interpretability. Our approach demonstrates performance comparable to state-of-the-art methods while offering superior efficiency and lightweight design due to its significantly reduced number of parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.