ArticleJournal of imaging2025
SADiff: Coronary Artery Segmentation in CT Angiography Using Spatial Attention and Diffusion Model.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- [A study on three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary arteries and numerical simulation of fractional flow reserve based on deep learning].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026Article
- A systematic review of artificial intelligence in radiotherapy associated cardiovascular toxicity.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2026Review
- IPSM-UNet: An Inverted Pyramid-Shaped U-Net++ Architecture with Multi-Resolution Information Interaction for Coronary Artery Segmentation.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Human In Vivo Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 7 T: Feasibility, Applications, and Current Limitations-A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Seg2RefineNet: a novel DL-based framework for 2D CCTA image-based segmentation and 3D volume-based refinement.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a highly prevalent cardiovascular disease and one of the leading causes of death worldwide. The accurate segmentation of coronary arteries from CT angiography (CTA) images is essential for the diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease. However, due to small vessel diameters, large morphological variations, low contrast, and motion artifacts, conventional segmentation methods, including classical image processing (such as region growing and level sets) and early deep learning models with limited receptive fields, are unsatisfactory. We propose SADiff, a hybrid framework that integrates a dilated attention network (DAN) for ROI extraction, a diffusion-based subnet for noise suppression in low-contrast regions, and a striped attention network (SAN) to refine tubular structures affected by morphological variations. Experiments on the public ImageCAS dataset show that it has a Dice score of 83.48% and a Hausdorff distance of 19.43 mm, which is 6.57% higher than U-Net3D in terms of Dice. The cross-dataset validation on the private ImageLaPP dataset verifies its generalizability with a Dice score of 79.42%. This comprehensive evaluation demonstrates that SADiff provides a more efficient and versatile method for coronary segmentation and shows great potential for improving the diagnosis and treatment of CAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.