ArticleJournal of imaging2025
SAM for Road Object Segmentation: Promising but Challenging.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Road object segmentation is crucial for autonomous driving, as it enables vehicles to perceive their surroundings. While deep learning models show promise, their generalization across diverse road conditions, weather variations, and lighting changes remains challenging. Different approaches have been proposed to address this limitation. However, these models often struggle with the varying appearance of road objects under diverse environmental conditions. Foundation models such as the Segment Anything Model (SAM) offer a potential avenue for improved generalization in complex visual tasks. Thus, this study presents a pioneering comprehensive evaluation of the SAM for zero-shot road object segmentation, without explicit prompts. This study aimed to determine the inherent capabilities and limitations of the SAM in accurately segmenting a variety of road objects under the diverse and challenging environmental conditions encountered in real-world autonomous driving scenarios. We assessed the SAM's performance on the KITTI, BDD100K, and Mapillary Vistas datasets, encompassing a wide range of environmental conditions. Using a variety of established evaluation metrics, our analysis revealed the SAM's capabilities and limitations in accurately segmenting various road objects, particularly highlighting challenges posed by dynamic environments, illumination changes, and occlusions. These findings provide valuable insights for researchers and developers seeking to enhance the robustness of foundation models such as the SAM in complex road environments, guiding future efforts to improve perception systems for autonomous driving.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.