ArticleJournal of imaging2025
A Structured and Methodological Review on Multi-View Human Activity Recognition for Ambient Assisted Living.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- DaRA Dataset: Combining Wearable Sensors, Location Tracking, and Process Knowledge for Enhanced Human Activity and Human Context Recognition in Warehousing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Implementing ensemble of deep learning model with optimization techniques for human activity recognition to assist individuals with disabilities.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- RGB-D Cameras and Brain-Computer Interfaces for Human Activity Recognition: An Overview.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Comprehensive Methodological Survey of Human Activity Recognition Across Diverse Data Modalities.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) leverages technology to support the elderly and individuals with disabilities. A key challenge in these systems is efficient Human Activity Recognition (HAR). However, no study has systematically compared single-view (SV) and multi-view (MV) Human Activity Recognition approaches. This review addresses this gap by analyzing the evolution from single-view to multi-view recognition systems, covering benchmark datasets, feature extraction methods, and classification techniques. We examine how activity recognition systems have transitioned to multi-view architectures using advanced deep learning models optimized for Ambient Assisted Living, thereby improving accuracy and robustness. Furthermore, we explore a wide range of machine learning and deep learning models-including Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, Temporal Convolutional Networks (TCNs), and Graph Convolutional Networks (GCNs)-along with lightweight transfer learning methods suitable for environments with limited computational resources. Key challenges such as data remediation, privacy, and generalization are discussed, alongside potential solutions such as sensor fusion and advanced learning strategies. This study offers comprehensive insights into recent advancements and future directions, guiding the development of intelligent, efficient, and privacy-compliant Human Activity Recognition systems for Ambient Assisted Living applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.