Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40558774›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2025

A Study on Energy Consumption in AI-Driven Medical Image Segmentation.

R Prajwal, S J Pawan, Shahin Nazarian, Nicholas Heller, Christopher J Weight, Vinay Duddalwar, C-C Jay Kuo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

R PrajwalRadiomics Lab, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
S J PawanRadiomics Lab, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Shahin NazarianMing Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Nicholas HellerGlickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleaveland, OH 44125, USA.
Christopher J WeightGlickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleaveland, OH 44125, USA.
Vinay DuddalwarRadiomics Lab, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4808-5715
C-C Jay KuoMing Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9474-5035

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As artificial intelligence advances in medical image analysis, its environmental impact remains largely overlooked. This study analyzes the energy demands of AI workflows for medical image segmentation using the popular Kidney Tumor Segmentation-2019 (KiTS-19) dataset. It examines how training and inference differ in energy consumption, focusing on factors that influence resource usage, such as computational complexity, memory access, and I/O operations. To address these aspects, we evaluated three variants of convolution-Standard Convolution, Depthwise Convolution, and Group Convolution-combined with optimization techniques such as Mixed Precision and Gradient Accumulation. While training is energy-intensive, the recurring nature of inference often results in significantly higher cumulative energy consumption over a model's life cycle. Depthwise Convolution with Mixed Precision achieves the lowest energy consumption during training while maintaining strong performance, making it the most energy-efficient configuration among those tested. In contrast, Group Convolution fails to achieve energy efficiency due to significant input/output overhead. These findings emphasize the need for GPU-centric strategies and energy-conscious AI practices, offering actionable guidance for designing scalable, sustainable innovation in medical image analysis.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencemedical image segmentationsustainability

Identifiers

PMID40558774
PMCPMC12194113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.