ArticleJournal of imaging2025
Performance of A Statistical-Based Automatic Contrast-to-Noise Ratio Measurement on Images of the ACR CT Phantom.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High-pressure-resistant totally implantable venous power ports for improving image quality in contrast-enhanced computed tomography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluates the performance of a statistical-based automatic contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measurement method on images of the ACR CT phantom under varying imaging parameters. A statistical automatic method for segmenting low-contrast objects and for measuring CNR was recently introduced. The method employs a 25 mm region of interest (ROI), rotated in 2° clockwise steps, to identify the low-contrast object by locating the maximum CT value. The CNR was measured on images acquired with different parameters: tube voltage (80-140 kVp), tube current (80-200 mA), slice thickness (1.25-10 mm), field of view (190-230 mm), and convolution kernel (edge, ultra, lung, bone, chest, standard). The automatic results were compared to manual measurements. The automatic method accurately identified the largest low-contrast object. The CNR values from the automatic and manual methods showed no significant difference (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.