ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Biopolymers in Facial Aesthetics: Gel-Based Applications, Safety, Effectiveness, and Future Prospects-A Systematic Review of the Literature.
Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced on Minimally Invasive Techniques in Facial Rejuvenation: A Comprehensive Review.World journal of plastic surgery · 2026Review
- Advances in Anti-aging Procedures: A Comprehensive Review of Surgical and Non-surgical Rejuvenation Techniques.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biopolymer-based dermal fillers have gained attention in facial aesthetics due to their biocompatibility, gel-forming properties, and capacity to stimulate tissue regeneration. However, evidence regarding their clinical performance remains scattered and inconsistent. This systematic review evaluates the current scientific literature on the effectiveness and safety of injectable biopolymers used in facial aesthetic procedures. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases for studies published between 2016 and 2024. Only human studies in English assessing clinical efficacy, safety, adverse events, and patient satisfaction were included. Of the 280 articles initially identified, 9 met the inclusion criteria. The selected studies showed improvements in facial volume and wrinkle reduction with gel-based biopolymers such as poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), polycaprolactone (PCL), and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Most studies reported high patient satisfaction and a low incidence of serious adverse effects. However, methodological heterogeneity and limited long-term data reduced the strength of the evidence. While injectable biopolymers appear to be effective and generally safe, current evidence is limited and variable. Further multicenter randomized trials with standardized protocols and longer follow-up periods are needed. Clinicians should apply these materials with caution, ensuring individualized treatment planning and careful risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.