ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Multiplexing 3D Natural Scaffolds to Optimize the Repair and Regeneration of Chronic Diabetic Wounds.
Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- [Diabetic foot care: full-lifecycle management driven by digital intelligent technologies].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026Pooled it
- From Clinical Practice to Basic Science, in Search for the Ideal Implantable Bioreactor: A Review on MFAT (Micro-Fragmented Adipose Tissue-LipogemsInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- From Smart Hydrogel Design to 4D-Printed Scaffolds: Emerging Paradigms in Precision Drug Delivery and Regenerative Wound Therapy.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Hydrogel-extracellular vesicle engineering delivery system: a promising therapeutic strategy for wound healing.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Correction: Moldovan et al. Multiplexing 3D Natural Scaffolds to Optimize the Repair and Regeneration of Chronic Diabetic Wounds.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) represent a major complication of diabetes mellitus, affecting millions of patients worldwide and leading to high morbidity and amputation risks. The impaired healing process in DFU is driven by vascular insufficiency, neuropathy, chronic inflammation, and infections. Conventional treatments, including blood sugar control, wound debridement, and standard dressings, have shown limited efficacy in achieving complete healing. Recent advancements have introduced novel therapeutic approaches such as stem cell therapy, exosome-based treatments, and bioengineered scaffolds to accelerate wound healing and tissue regeneration. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), particularly adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs), exhibit anti-inflammatory, pro-angiogenic, and immunomodulatory properties, enhancing wound repair. Additionally, exosomes derived from ASCs have demonstrated the ability to promote fibroblast proliferation, regulate inflammation, and stimulate angiogenesis. The integration of bioengineered scaffolds, including hydrogels, hyaluronic acid (HA), or micro-fragmented adipose tissue (MFAT), offers improved drug delivery mechanisms and a controlled healing environment. These scaffolds have been successfully utilized to deliver stem cells, growth factors, antioxidants, anti-glycation end products, anti-inflammatory and anti-diabetic drugs, or antimicrobial agents, further improving DFU outcomes. This review highlights the potential of combining novel 3D scaffolds with anti-diabetic drugs to enhance DFU treatment, reduce amputation rates, and improve patients' quality of life. While promising, further clinical research is required to validate these emerging therapies and optimize their clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.