ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025
Early Echocardiographic Markers in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.
Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitochondrial Dysregulation and Molecular Signaling in Systemic Sclerosis Cardiac Disease: An Integrative Echocardiographic, Microvascular, and Biomarker Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Prevalence of right ventricular dysfunction and its echocardiographic predictors in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a retrospective cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Contrast-Free Myocardial Infarction Segmentation with Attention U-Net.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Role of imaging techniques in monitoring atrial cardiomyopathy and atrial failure: a scientific statement.ESC heart failure · 2026Review
- Myocardial work abnormalities in rheumatoid arthritis with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction are more closely related to disease activity than to disease duration: a prospective cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- When the Liver Echoes to the Heart: Assessing Subclinical Cardiac Dysfunction in NAFLD Using Speckle Tracking Echocardiography-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represents nearly half of all heart failure cases and remains diagnostically challenging due to its heterogeneous pathophysiology and often subtle myocardial dysfunction. Conventional echocardiographic parameters, such as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and the left atrial volume index (LAVI), frequently fail to detect early functional changes. Advanced echocardiographic techniques have emerged as valuable tools for early diagnosis and risk stratification. Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) allows for the identification of subclinical systolic dysfunction, even with preserved LVEF. Left Atrial Strain (LAS), particularly reservoir and pump strain, provides sensitive markers of diastolic function and elevated filling pressures, offering additional diagnostic and prognostic insights. Myocardial Work (MW), through non-invasive pressure-strain loops, enables load-independent assessment of contractility, while Right Ventricular Free Wall Longitudinal Strain (RVFWLS) captures early right heart involvement, often present in advanced HFpEF. The integration of these advanced parameters can enhance diagnostic precision and guide personalized treatment strategies. This review highlights the current evidence and clinical applications of strain-based imaging in HFpEF, underscoring the importance of a multiparametric, pathophysiology-oriented approach in heart failure evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.