Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40558646›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2025

Driveline Relocation and Vacuum-Assisted Closure for Ventricular Assist Device Driveline Infections.

Mehmet Cahit Saricaoglu, Melisa Kandemir, Elif M Saricaoglu, Ali Fuat Karacuha, Ezel Kadiroglu, Mustafa Farah Abdullahi, Mustafa Bahadir Inan, Alpay Azap, Ahmet Ruchan Akar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Infections in mechanical circulatory support.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mehmet Cahit SaricaogluDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Center, Cebeci Hospitals, Ankara University School of Medicine, Dikimevi, Ankara 06340, Turkey.
Melisa KandemirDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Center, Cebeci Hospitals, Ankara University School of Medicine, Dikimevi, Ankara 06340, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-2536-3820
Elif M SaricaogluDepartment of Infectious Disease and Clinical Microbiology, Ibni Sina Hospital, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara 06340, Turkey.
Ali Fuat KaracuhaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Center, Cebeci Hospitals, Ankara University School of Medicine, Dikimevi, Ankara 06340, Turkey.ORCID 0009-0000-4280-6289
Ezel KadirogluDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Center, Cebeci Hospitals, Ankara University School of Medicine, Dikimevi, Ankara 06340, Turkey.
Mustafa Farah AbdullahiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Center, Cebeci Hospitals, Ankara University School of Medicine, Dikimevi, Ankara 06340, Turkey.
Mustafa Bahadir InanDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Center, Cebeci Hospitals, Ankara University School of Medicine, Dikimevi, Ankara 06340, Turkey.
Alpay AzapDepartment of Infectious Disease and Clinical Microbiology, Ibni Sina Hospital, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara 06340, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-5035-055X
Ahmet Ruchan AkarDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Center, Cebeci Hospitals, Ankara University School of Medicine, Dikimevi, Ankara 06340, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-5191-5505

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDurable mechanical circulatory support (DMCS) infections remain a serious challenge. Ventricular assist device (VAD)-specific driveline infections (DLIs) are the most common type; however, no consensus exists on their surgical management. We aimed to define the incidence, risk factors, and microbiology of DLIs and discuss the surgical treatment modalities.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 90 patients who underwent a left or biventricular ventricular assist device (LVAD or BiVAD) implantation with either a HeartMate 2 (Abbott), HeartWare HVAD (Medtronic), or HeartMate 3 (Abbott) in a single center between 1 March 2011 and 30 May 2023.

resultsDLIs were detected in 20 (21.5%) patients during the follow-up. The mean duration of VAD support was 561.1 ± 833.2 days (1-4124 days), while it was 1277.9 ± 621.6 days in the DLI group. An extended duration of VAD support was associated with higher incidence rates of late-onset DLIs (

conclusionsOur results suggest that DLIs are common infectious complications after VAD implantation, which endanger patient autonomy, and impair their quality of life and overall survival. A DL relocation through the rectus muscles and VAC strategies have a role in controlling DLIs.

Indexed as

driveline dressingdriveline infectionsleft ventricular assist devicesmicroorganisms

Identifiers

PMID40558646
PMCPMC12193468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.