ReviewDiseases (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Integration of AI and ML in Tuberculosis (TB) Management: From Diagnosis to Drug Discovery.
Review in Diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Advances in the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Microbiological Testing].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026Review
- Drug-resistant tuberculosis and pulmonary co-infections in immunocompromised patients: from multi-omics to precision therapy.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of AI-assisted chest radiographs in tuberculosis screening: A Ghanaian clinical study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Large language models and large concept models in radiology: Present challenges, future directions, and critical perspectives.World journal of radiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) is an infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Despite the improvements in diagnostic techniques, the accuracy of TB diagnosis is still low. In recent years, the development of artificial intelligence (AI) has opened up new possibilities in diagnosing and treating TB with high accuracy compared to traditional methods. Traditional diagnostic techniques, such as sputum smear microscopy, culture tests, and chest X-rays, are time-consuming, with less sensitivity for the detection of TB in patients. Due to the new developments in AI, advanced diagnostic and treatment techniques have been developed with high accessibility, speed, and accuracy. AI, including various specific methodologies, is becoming vital in managing TB. Machine learning (ML) methodologies, such as support vector machines (SVMs) and random forests (RF), alongside deep learning (DL) technologies, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for image analysis, are employed to analyze diverse patient data, including medical images and biomarkers, to enhance the accuracy and speed of tuberculosis diagnosis. This study summarized the benefits and drawbacks of both traditional and AI-driven TB diagnosis, highlighting how AI can support traditional techniques to increase early detection, lower misdiagnosis, and strengthen international TB control initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.