ArticleCells2025
The Pro-Angiogenic Potential of Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells and Dental Pulp Stem Cells: A Comparative Analysis.
Article in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the Angiogenic Potential of Poly(ε-Caprolactone) PCL/Bioactive Glass Composites in a Co-Culture Model of ASCs and HMEC-1.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Surface marker-defined functional subpopulations of mesenchymal stromal cells: mechanisms, applications, and clinical translation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Substrate stiffness modulates human gingival fibroblast paracrine signaling to promote osteogenic differentiation of human periodontal ligament cells.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- An Update Regarding the Use of Contemporary Dental Materials in Periodontal Regeneration.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The application of dental mesenchymal stem cells (DMSCs) in the repair of oral and maxillofacial defects.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The role of periodontal ligament stem cells (PDLSCs) and dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in stimulating angiogenesis has been reported, but their angiogenetic potential has not been directly compared. In this work, paired PDLSCs and DPSCs, i.e., derived from the same donor, were tested for their immunophenotype and multi-differentiation capabilities, with particular emphasis on their pro-angiogenic activity. Flow cytometry was utilized to study the expression of mesenchymal stem cell, pericyte, and endothelial markers, while gene expression was evaluated through real-time PCR. The angiogenic potential was assessed recurring to tubulogenesis assay, co-cultures with Human Microvascular Endothelial Cell (HMEC-1), and VEGF-A quantification. The immunophenotype of DPSCs and PDLSCs was different in CD146+ and CD31+ cell subsets, but both cell types promoted HMEC-1 tubulogenesis in vitro. Consistently, VEGF-A gene expression level and its quantification in cell-conditioned media of PDLSCs and DPSCs was comparable between them, and both promoted the formation of vessel-like structures, when co-cultured with HMEC-1 cells. All together, these results showed the heterogeneity of PDLSCs and DPSCs, which are constituted of different cellular subsets, likely modulated by the microenvironmental cues. PDLSCs and DPSCs showed comparable pro-angiogenic activity, enhanced by the contemporary expression of angiogenic and chemotactic factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.