ReviewBiosensors2025
Electrochemical Microneedles for Real-Time Monitoring in Interstitial Fluid: Emerging Technologies and Future Directions.
Review in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polymeric microneedles for closed-loop drug delivery: from biosensing to therapy.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Recent advances in hybrid nano-interfaces for environmental pollutant detection: design principles, signal transduction, and analytical performance.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Review
- Wearable Biosensors for Continuous Monitoring of Chronic Kidney Disease: Materials, Biofluids, and Digital Health Integration.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Biosensor-Integrated Microneedle Devices for Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic and Infectious Diseases: Current Status, Trends and Challenges.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Challenges of Wearable Biosensors and Ways to Overcome Them.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Microneedle Technologies for Drug Delivery: Innovations, Applications, and Commercial Challenges.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Biomarker integration and biosensor technologies enabling AI-driven insights into biological aging.Frontiers in aging · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional blood-based detection methods for biomarkers and analytes face significant limitations, including complex processing, variability in blood components, and the inability to provide continuous monitoring. These challenges hinder the early diagnosis and effective management of various health conditions. Electrochemical microneedles (MNs) have emerged as a minimally invasive and highly efficient platform to overcome these barriers, enabling continuous molecular monitoring by directly accessing the interstitial fluid. Electrochemical MNs offer several advantages, including reduced patient discomfort, real-time data acquisition, enhanced specificity, and potential applications in wearable, long-term monitoring. In this review, we first analyze material selection and fabrication techniques to optimize sensor performance, stability, and biocompatibility. We then examine diverse detection strategies utilized in electrochemical MNs, including enzyme-based, aptamer-based, and antibody-based sensing mechanisms, each offering unique benefits in sensitivity and selectivity. Finally, we highlight the integration of electrochemical MN technology with multi-target detection, AI-driven analytics, and theragnostic capabilities. This convergence offers strong potential for smart healthcare and precision medicine. Through these technological innovations, electrochemical MNs are expected to play an important role in advancing continuous, noninvasive health monitoring and personalized medical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.