SynthesisBiosensors2025
The Use of CRISPR-Cas Systems for Viral Detection: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- CRISPR-Cas and Infectious Diseases: A Decade of Translational Advances in Molecular Biotechnology.Biochemical genetics · 2026Review
- Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) for the Diagnosis of High-Burden Viral Diseases in Resource-Limited Countries.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advances and emerging technologies in the diagnosis of viral infections in pigs: Progress, challenges, and One Health perspectives.Veterinary world · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Viral infections impose a significant burden on global public health and the economy. This study examines the current state of CRISPR-Cas system research, focusing on their applications in viral detection and their evolution over recent years. A bibliometric analysis and systematic review were conducted using articles published between 2019 and 2024, retrieved from Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases. Out of 2713 identified articles, 194 were included in the analysis. The findings reveal substantial growth in scientific output related to CRISPR-Cas systems, with the United States leading in research and development in this field. The rapid increase in CRISPR-Cas research during this period underscores its immense potential to transform viral diagnostics. With advantages such as speed, precision, and suitability for deployment in resource-limited settings, CRISPR-Cas systems outperform many traditional diagnostic methods. The concerted efforts of scientists worldwide further highlight the promising future of this technology. CRISPR-Cas systems are emerging as a powerful alternative, offering the possibility of expedited and accessible point-of-care testing and paving the way for more equitable and effective diagnostics on a global scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.