ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Chemical and Biological Properties of C-Point Obturation Cones.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The effect of liposomal ellagic acid on the biological properties of dental restorative materials: An in vitro comparative study.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
- Assessment of healing after primer endodontic treatment and retreatment using fractal analysis and PAI score over a 24-month follow-up.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Histopathologic responses of the dental pulp to an experimental calcium aluminate-calcium silicate based capping material in comparison to mineral trioxide aggregate.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Coronal tubule penetration of different calcium silicate materials in regenerative endodontics: a comparative study with a novel imaging method.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the chemical composition and subcutaneous tissue biocompatibility of C-Point, a root canal filling material, compared to ProTaper gutta-percha cones (control). Material characterization was conducted using scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS). For biocompatibility assessment, both materials were implanted subcutaneously in the dorsal connective tissue of sixteen albino rats (n = 8 per group). Histological evaluation of inflammatory infiltrate intensity was performed at 30 and 60 days post-implantation, with statistical analysis (significance set at
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.