ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Multi-Feature Facial Complexion Classification Algorithms Based on CNN.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Variations in facial complexion serve as a telltale sign of underlying health conditions. Precisely categorizing facial complexions poses a significant challenge due to the subtle distinctions in facial features. Three multi-feature facial complexion classification algorithms leveraging convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are proposed. They fuse, splice, or independently train the features extracted from distinct facial regions of interest (ROI), respectively. Innovative frameworks of the three algorithms can more effectively exploit facial features, improving the utilization rate of feature information and classification performance. We trained and validated the three algorithms on the dataset consisting of 721 facial images that we had collected and preprocessed. The comprehensive evaluation reveals that multi-feature fusion and splicing classification algorithms achieve accuracies of 95.98% and 93.76%, respectively. The optimal approach combining multi-feature CNN with machine learning algorithms attains a remarkable accuracy of 97.78%. Additionally, these experiments proved that the multidomain combination was crucial, and the arrangement of ROI features, including the nose, forehead, philtrum, and right and left cheek, was the optimal choice for classification. Furthermore, we employed the EfficientNet model for training on the face image as a whole, which achieves a classification accuracy of 89.37%. The difference in accuracy underscores the superiority and efficacy of multi-feature classification algorithms. The employment of multi-feature fusion algorithms in facial complexion classification holds substantial advantages, ushering in fresh research directions in the field of facial complexion classification and deep learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.