ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Towards Self-Assembling 3D-Printed Shapes Through Βiomimetic Μechanical Interlocking.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Generative Design of 3D-Printed Biomimetic Interlocking Blocks Inspired by the Cellular 3D Puzzle Structure of the Walnut Shell.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While early studies on macroscopic self-assembly peaked in the late 20th century, recent research continues to explore and expand the field's potential through innovative materials and external control strategies. To harness this potential, a unit cell was designed and 3D-printed that could form a face-centered cubic lattice and stabilize it through a biomimetic mechanism for mechanical interlocking. The wing coupling structures of the brown marmorated stink bug were examined under a scanning electron microscope to be used as a source of bio-inspiration for the interlocking mechanism. A total of 20 unit cells were studied in five different self-assembly processes and in different compression scenarios. A maximum average of 34% of unit cells remained stable, and 20% were mechanically interlocked after self-assembly tests. The compression tests performed on a single unit cell revealed that the cell can withstand forces up to 1000 N without any plastic deformation. Pyramid configurations from 5-unit cells were manually assembled and assessed in compression tests. They showed an average compression force of 294 N. As the first study focused on self-assembly through mechanical interlocking, further studies that change the unit cell production and self-assembly processes are expected to improve upon these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.