ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Guided Bone Regeneration Using a Modified Occlusive Barrier with a Window: A Case Report.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Customized Titanium Occlusive Barriers with Window Modification for Guided Bone Regeneration: Radiographic and Histological Outcomes.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBone resorption following tooth loss poses significant challenges for dental implant success. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) techniques, particularly in vertically deficient ridges, often require complex procedures and soft tissue management. This case report introduces a modified occlusive barrier with a window, combined with tricalcium phosphate, to address these challenges.
methodsA 26-year-old female with significant bone loss in the mandibular anterior region underwent GBR using a digitally designed titanium occlusive barrier. The barrier was fabricated using CAD/CAM technology and secured with screws. A blood clot mixed with tricalcium phosphate was used to promote bone regeneration. Postoperative care included regular irrigation, de-epithelialization, and follow-up over six months. Implant placement and histological analysis were performed to evaluate outcomes. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient achieved 8.8 mm of vertical and 7.6 mm of horizontal bone regeneration. Histological analysis confirmed the presence of mature, mineralized bone, and keratinized gingiva. The implant was successfully placed, and a fixed prosthesis was restored after four months, with stable results at a three-year follow-up.
conclusionThis technique demonstrates effective bone and soft tissue regeneration in a single procedure, eliminating the need for autologous bone grafts and secondary surgeries. The use of a digitally designed occlusive barrier offers precision, reduces morbidity, and simplifies the surgical process, suggesting a promising advancement in GBR. Further studies are needed to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.